GB Trade Cover Inclusion Map

Every row is a verbatim sentence read from the named source's own page through our fetch service on the date shown, hash-pinned to the stored read (the sha of the page's visible text; the raw page is mirrored to R2).

9 of the 17 named sources that could be read published a usable figure; 8 published none and are recorded as not published, never filled in; 1 could not be read (blocked, dead or unreachable) and count nowhere.

The headline figures (median, minimum, maximum, quartiles) are over ONE figure per source for each breakdown it prices, in GBP (a source's median where its page yielded several accepted sentences for one breakdown), so a page that gives figures for several breakdowns gives one for each and N counts 15 figures, never sentences; 157 candidate sentence(s) were refused by a reviewer with the reason recorded.

The fuller derivation this dataset is chartered to grow into (not yet what the figures above are; they are each source's own published figure as read): For every 'from £X a month' in the price index, the four things that decide whether two prices are comparable at all: the limit of indemnity the from-price is quoted against (£1m, £2m, £5m, £10m), whether treatment risk is inside it or an add-on, whether tools and equipment are inside it, and whether employers' liability is included or sold separately.

The derivation is the COMPARABILITY MAP - the count of advertised prices that are quoted at the same limit, which on the first reads is small: Protectivity advertises cleaning cover at 'Public Liability up to £5m' from £3.46 while other sellers' cheapest tier is £1m, so the cheapest headline is frequently not the cheapest like-for-like.

Nobody publishes that reconciliation.

157 candidate sentences on these pages were refused by a reviewer; each refusal and its reason is recorded in the review ledger.