Landlord pet insurance, which is cover for pet damage rather than for a pet

Landlord pet insurance is not insurance for an animal. It is cover for damage a tenant's pet does to the property, and it exists because deposit rules limit what a landlord can hold against exactly that risk while lettings policy has pushed landlords towards accepting pets.

Why the product exists

Deposits are capped, and a scratched door, a soiled carpet or a chewed skirting can exceed what is held. Landlords who would otherwise refuse pets now have three options: refuse, charge a higher rent, or insure the risk. The third is the one this product serves, and some policies are sold to the tenant rather than the landlord.

What it covers and what it does not

Accidental damage by a pet to the property and to the landlord's contents, up to a limit, usually with an excess. It does not cover deliberate damage by the tenant, wear from ordinary use, infestation in most wordings, or damage the deposit could reasonably have covered. Odour and deep cleaning are treated differently by different insurers.

How it sits with the tenancy

Most landlords accepting pets do so with a written permission clause setting out what is allowed and what the tenant is responsible for. The insurance is a backstop to that rather than a substitute, and an inventory with photographs at the start of the tenancy is what makes either of them usable.

Questions people ask about landlord pet insurance

Is this insurance for the tenant's pet?

No. It covers damage the pet does to the property and to the landlord's contents. Veterinary cover is the owner's own pet insurance.

Who buys it, the landlord or the tenant?

Both exist. Some products are sold to tenants as an alternative to a higher deposit, others to landlords as an add on.

Does it replace a deposit?

No. It sits above what the deposit covers, and an inventory with photographs is what makes either of them work.

Sources

Related answers

See what insurers printCompare by trade